Early death of Cisco VPN Client forces VPN license fees Ethereal. Mind. Cisco has ceased development on the IPSec VPN client, and shifted to pushing the SSL VPN client for remote VPN access for both IOS and ASA platforms. But that costs up to USD1. VPN client. Is that good for customers VPN Client is disconnecting frequently. It happens on average every 1030 min or so. VPN Client error message Secure VPN Connection terminated. Latest trending topics being covered on ZDNet including Reviews, Tech Industry, Security, Hardware, Apple, and Windows. TheGreenBow VPN Client is compatible with all IPSec routers compliant to the existing standards IKE IPsec. Check our Certified VPN Products list, increasing daily. I want Cisco VPN client for 64 bit windows, currently I have 32 bit software. Or are we being shafted to increase revenue The Cisco VPN Client that uses IPSec as a dynamic remote access method to IOS, ASA, PIX and C6. Cisco has ceased development on the IPSec VPN client, and shifted to pushing the SSL VPN client for remote VPN access for both IOS and ASA platforms. But that costs. Learn how to create custom connection scripts for the Cisco VPN Client. Script logonlogin for Cisco VPN client. VPN modules is basically dead. From the Cisco Web site The Cisco VPN client supports Windows 2. XP and Vista x. 863. Linux Intel Mac OS X 1. Solaris Ultra. Sparc 3. For x. 64 6. 4 bit Windows support, you must utilize Ciscos next generation Cisco Any. Connect VPN Client. Link Here. And from the Product Q AsCisco VPN Client Version 5 is available for 3. Windows Vista. There are no current plans to provide 6. Cisco VPN Client but 6. Cisco Any. Connect VPN Client. There doesnt seem to be any End of Life or End of Support notices, so the current version must still be getting support, but there is no future for it. You can choose any technology, so long as it is SSL VPNA quick look at Cisco Any. Connect will confirm that this is an SSL VPN technology only. So this leads me to a few conclusions Cisco isnt planning on continuing the Cisco VPN Client. Cisco doesnt like IPSec as a dynamic secure remote access method. You must choose SSL VPN for remote access, because Cisco says so. I need to start planning to replace the Cisco VPN client in the next year or two. On several thousand desktops. Which is going to be greatand replace it with a technology that isnt nearly so lovely, simple and well understood. This looks like its saving Cisco money they dont have to develop and maintain two clients. But is going to cost us a shedload of cash. Which would be fine, I suppose, if I could find a good reason why changing from IPsec to SSL would be a goodthinggm. Whats good about SSL VPN then I was reading through some notes from Networkers and made the following list SSL VPNs have three modes clientless, thin client and full client. Clientless VPNs allow you to create a portal, which you can customise. CIFS Drive Shares appear in a web page for clientless modeFor thin client mode, you can deliver Java plugins that let you access certain services such as Citrix, ssh, telnet, RDP without having the client programs on your PCThick client acts the same as IPSec VPN client, but can be installed initiated from the web browser sort ofThe SSL VPN client is NOT FREE not so goodDid I mention that the SSL VPN Client option is not FREE. So the IPSec VPN, which most of us are very happy with and used to, is free for an unlimited amount of users. These release notes are for the Cisco VPN Client, Release 5. Microsoft Windows 7 32bit only. The VPN Client on a remote PC. Im using Windows XP Home Edition, sp3 with McAfee antivirus. When I tried the fix that involved enabling vpn adaptor, setting tcpip to auto config, and then. Solved Some details about the issue. Im trying to connect to my clients network using VPN Client version 5. The user authetication is done by providing. But the replacement requires a license for every user past two. And you will be forced to upgrade since the VPN Client doesnt work on modern systems not straightaway, one day Microsoft will get a version of the Windows to replace Windows XP. Cisco Vpn Client 5.0 05 For Windows 7' title='Cisco Vpn Client 5.0 05 For Windows 7' />Yeah, Ive got the same feeling as you. I am going to pay for SSL VPN technology that Cisco is forcing you to move towards. They have chosen to do that. Now that is customer focussed. How much Here are the USD list prices for the SSL licenses IOS SSL VPN Licences. FL WEBVPN 1. 0 K9. Feature License IOS SSL VPN Up To 1. Users Incremental3. FL WEBVPN 2. 5 K9. Feature License IOS SSL VPN Up To 2. Users Incremental7. FL WEBVPN 1. 00 K9. Feature License IOS SSL VPN Up To 1. Users Incremental3,0. ASA SSL VPN Licences. ASA5. 50. 0 SSL 1. ASA 5. 50. 0 SSL VPN 1. Premium User License1,2. ASA5. 50. 0 SSL 2. ASA 5. 50. 0 SSL VPN 2. Premium User License3,0. ASA5. 50. 0 SSL 5. ASA 5. 50. 0 SSL VPN 5. Premium User License3,9. ASA5. 50. 0 SSL 1. ASA 5. 50. 0 SSL VPN 1. Premium User License7,9. ASA5. 50. 0 SSL 2. ASA 5. 50. 0 SSL VPN 2. Premium User License1. ASA5. 50. 0 SSL 5. ASA 5. 50. 0 SSL VPN 5. Premium User License2. ASA SSL 1. 0 2. ASA 5. SSL VPN 1. Premium User Upgrade License1,8. ASA SSL 2. 5 5. ASA 5. SSL VPN 2. Premium User Upgrade License1,9. ASA SSL 5. 0 1. ASA 5. SSL VPN 5. Premium User Upgrade License3,9. Rule of Thumb. So an IOS SSL VPN connection is going to cost about USD3. An ASA SSL VPN is going to cost USD1. OUCH Remember that a lot of companies use VPNs as a DR feature and that is the peak load condition when say, 4. This means that SSL VPN licenses are not good value for money since they are only used in exceptional circumstances. Wheres the WIN then. To be frank, Im not sure. For most people, choosing IPSec is the default choice. Its simple, well known, easy to do and doesnt cost anything. SSL VPN is a bewildering array for policies for inheritance and self configuration. It has all the features of the IPSec client for AAA and maintenace, plus some fancy clientless modes. But it costs quite a bit. Lack of Competition. The IPSec VPN client was made free when all the firewall vendors had VPN capability. But the current lack of competition in SSL VPNs means that prices arent likely to reduce. For example, F5 and Juniper needs volume licensing on their SSL VPN products to make any money at all. Check. Point always charges for for everything until they lose market share. So there isnt much motivation for Cisco to remove volume licensing on SSL. And by discontinuing the IPSec VPN Client you are being forced to pay the license fee. So Help Me out. Is there any features or special powers that the SSL VPN has that I can pitch to justify the migration Is there some justification that SSL has inherent magical powers or is this a cynical revenue grab Sound off in the comments. Install Windows 2000 In Dosbox Frontend. Id love to find out.